Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here | ||
|
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Extended confirmed protection: Disruption from an auto-confirmed account and an IP (possibly a sockpuppet) who persist with copyright violations. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 18:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Question: Is this still an issue now that the copyrighted image has been deleted from commons? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:21, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- The account won't easily give up on trying to get their way, that's for sure. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. That's what that response sounds like you're suggesting. Daniel Case (talk) 04:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- The account won't easily give up on trying to get their way, that's for sure. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry. EF5 18:58, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just two instances of disruption, easily handled, in the last couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Because we have arrived at a new year, all the entries are being actively updated for 2024. Unfortunately, a number of novice editors (some of them possibly violating COI), are making mistakes in their haste to update their favourite local airport. Ok, I'm being harsh, but even Assuming Good Faith, this article is sustaining damage. It either needs protection, or extra eyes on every new edit. Meanwhile I am repairing whatever I can find, but my own editing skills are limited. There is also a decade-long edit-war regarding the definition of "Europe". Airports in Turkey, Cyprus, Madeira, the Canary Islands, and Russia are involved. Please help! WendlingCrusader (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't really see a lot of reverting going on, and, well, seasonal poorly-executed good faith edits come with the turf on an article like this. Your suggestion for extra eyes is a better option ... perhaps WT:AVIATION would be a better place to go. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recent repeated IP vandalism. Been temp protected before. High level of reverts because article is a magnet. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 22:47, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2600:100C:A20C:1A22:0:0:0:0/65 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism over the past day and higher levels in the past month. Jon698 (talk) 23:51, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Every one who has attacked the article lately, at least. All registered accounts indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Lots of activity from new or IP editors, which introduces OR or BLP editing problems. This is a topic that involves crime and people constantly add the names of non-convicted people which has to be reverted. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- This is unrelated to today. The BLP issues are constant since the page's creation. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Prolonged edit warring by IP editor. Apocheir (talk) 01:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Changing team to Spurs even though not confirmed. Sushidude21! (talk) 02:05, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Bagumba. For three days. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry. EF5 02:23, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism and BLP violations, most recently requiring revdeletion. Jfire (talk) 03:43, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Protection expired less than a week ago, and there are already problematic undue weight edits such as adding "convicted felon" to the lead. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 03:49, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:36, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And, actually, the protection had expired two months ago. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: deceased user, m:Special:diff/27686293#Global_block_for_Cloudcolors. Sinsyuan✍️🌏🚀 04:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Fully protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent sockpuppetry. Bishonen | tålk 05:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: is there incorrect information that needs to be corrected. Mahmood2026 (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Even disregarding that this is in a contentious topic, this article was constantly protected over the years before its most recent and indefinite protection three years ago. Use the talk page to suggest edits or talk with El C to see if he is willing to lift protection. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The protection isn't necessary because the article is in really bad shape and needs a lot of improvement. There's a ton of original research, and I checked seven sources, none of them support the claims in the article. Some of it is also unsourced or just poorly written. I won’t go into every issue here because it would take too long, about 50% of the article needs work. I’m not suggesting full removal of protection, as that could lead to further problems just a reduction to allow for constructive edits. 185.187.78.216 (talk) 18:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging @Xymmax: However, your request is, as phrased, not looking like one we'd approve. Kurds and Kurdistan, after all, is another contentious topic, and if are truly interested in improving the article you'd register an account and work on other unprotected articles developing the editorial and interpersonal skills that will make us proud of you when you gain extended-confirmed user rights. Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: there is alot of incorrect information that needs to be corrected and I have alot of info to add, with valid sourcesHinduhindu108 (talk) 03:44, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Hinduhindu108: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:47, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Not unprotected This time I'm the protecting admin. Again, this is within an area that falls under community sanctions. As I suggested above, it is better that you continue editing legitimately (i.e., do not try to game this) until you have made the 300 edits necessary to gain extended-confimed status. Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Add that 80 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed since the “ceasefire” began (i.e. genocide direct deaths have continued albeit at a slower pace) https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/death-and-destruction-returning-to-rafah https://news.antiwar.com/2025/01/29/israeli-forces-have-killed-more-than-80-palestinians-in-gaza-since-ceasefire-went-into-effect/ Seahumidity (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Add info about 35 year reduction in life expectancy according to UPenn study http://www.thedp.com/article/2025/01/penn-study-gaza-life-expectancy-drop Seahumidity (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
I want to talk the on discussion page about the name of the conflict Xenomire (talk) 20:07, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
- No. Get some experience editing topic areas that aren't contentious first. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.