Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

15 February 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< February 14	February 16 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Yo quiero ser tonta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced film stub. Not clear this work passes WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. 4meter4 (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of lap pools in San Francisco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a travel guide and not encyclopedic. WP:NOTGUIDE Kstern (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Lists, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE as well as the fact that none of these appear particularly notable. (Acer's Communication Receptacle | what did I do now) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 16:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of the Press (report)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page about an extinct report with no RS supporting it, only the self-published primary sources of the report's authoring organisation. The world in data site simply aggregates the data without offering meaningful coverage. No evidence of notability or RS material capable of supporting an encyclopedia page on the topic. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check for sources? (Acer's Communication Receptacle | what did I do now) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 16:08, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gender Construction in African Literature

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. This is a WP:ESSAY. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:04, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Africa. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:04, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an interesting topic, but the content is original research and therefore not suitable for Wikipedia. pburka (talk) 15:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MTV Roadies: Double Cross

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While there has been a substantial amount of work done since this was draftified previously, the references are not useful in verifying notability. It relies on two sources flagged as unreliable and used in multiple places. Substantial improvement to the referencing quality will solve this problem. Fails WP:V - I would have returned it to draft with this issue, but am prevented by WP:DRAFTOBJECT, which is why we are here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:08, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:08, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge with MTV Roadies. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 10:55, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment– This has received one full-length review (Koimoi), and with one more, it may pass WP:NF. EmilyR34 (talk) 14:03, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Efisio Arru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Google search returned few results, and the returned results weren't significant. (Acer's Communication Receptacle | what did I do now) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 14:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. (Acer's Communication Receptacle | what did I do now) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 14:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Academics and educators. (Acer's Communication Receptacle | what did I do now) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 14:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Italy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quipu (cosmic structure)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Standard example of WP:TOOSOON. Proposed cosmology structure based upon a single article which was accepted for publication in January 2025 (a week or two ago), plus a writeup in a popular science magazine (Smithsonian Magazine) a few days ago. No secondary sources, work is far too new to have been analyzed by the wider community. Article was draftified, pointing out that Wikipedia is not for recent proposals or neologisms, only for established science with secondary sources etc. Editor ignored draftification and moved back to main without any attempt to explain or generate a consensus. Wikipedia is a trailing indicator, not a leading indicator. Pages such as this belong on Facebook or similar until there is a body of secondary sources, not Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Astronomy. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Yep, that's prime WP:TOOSOON territory. Wait for some secondary literature to pick up the term, then try to write an article about it. Sheesh, the sole source hasn't even been formally published yet. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yorùbá Boy Running

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The first thing to note is the issues that were placed by CycloneYoris, the second would be that this article contains promotional words (which CycloneYoris have remove some of it). Lastly the reference only refers to the book itself, there is no other sources in this article. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The book definitely meets WP:NBOOK — see [1] [2] [3] [4] — but the article is clearly not suitable for mainspace in its current form. I'll try to find the time to fix it myself, but otherwise I would probably suggest draftifying. MCE89 (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:43, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. No valid deletion rationale has been provided, although WP:TNT might apply. pburka (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andreas Kleinlein

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It appears that this stub might just contain all the information that exists about this person: i.e. that he was a German instrument maker and anarcho-syndicalist, he was born in 1864 and died in 1925, and that he was a member of the FVdG.

I went through the Google Scholar results[5] - which include 5 German language sources, 1 English language source and 1 Portuguese language source, as well as 2 of Kleinlein's own (almost entirely uncited) books - and none of them provide significant coverage of this person; most of them provide only passing mentions, with barely even a sentence dedicated to him and no more information than what is already in this stub.

This article appears to fall very far from meeting our notability guidelines on people, and there doesn't appear to be anything worth merging into other articles. As an alternative to deletion, I could have recommended a redirect to Free Association of German Trade Unions#Pre-war period, but there are no mainspace links to this article other than that one so it would largely be a circular and redundant redirect. As such, I'm proposing this article for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Music, France, and Germany. Grnrchst (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vishnu v Raj

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being the president of Socialist Yuva Janata, which appears to be a non-notable party, does not automatically establish notability. There is nothing to justify inclusion. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL.Junbeesh (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, India, and Kerala. Junbeesh (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a very similar article about the same subject was deleted recently, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishnu V Raj. Possibly a candidate for speedy deletion, but I can't remember how similar the article was. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SunloungerFrog. Agree that this might be eligible for speedy deletion under G4 — from memory I think the previous article was similar, but not sure if it was sufficiently identical. Versions of this article have already been deleted through BLPPROD at the title Vishnu V. Raj and through AfD at the title Vishnu V Raj (then G4'd twice and SALTed) in just the last month. MCE89 (talk) 12:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sign of WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Almost definitely eligible for WP:G4 and WP:G5 as well. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neoauthoritarianism (China)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article should be deleted because it is essentially an extension of Conservatism in China article and does not warrant a separate entry. Neoauthoritarianism is referring to the conservative ideology within the PRC, making it more appropriate as a section within the broader article rather than a standalone page. Merging the content will provide a more organized discussion of conservative thought in China without unnecessary fragmentation. Guotaian (talk) 10:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Keep. Conservatism in China and Neoauthoritarianism (China) are different; pro-ROC, Falun Gong, other conservatives. And 'neo-conservatism' and 'neo-authoritarianism' are not synonymous. ProKMT (talk) 10:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conservatism, Politics, and China. Shellwood (talk) 10:37, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National Social Norms Resource Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A mere 3 google news hits. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 10:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Organizations, and United States of America. LibStar (talk) 10:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Speaking of hits, Google Books has hits. Are we sure we can not get SIGCOV from here? I’m seeing atleast two in the first page. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:37, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nufan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per refs given, fails WP:N and WP:NORG. No in-depth independent coverage of this org. Related: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC Crewe (2nd nomination). Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Football, and United Kingdom. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:49, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT - AFC Crewe has been deleted twice at AFD, this is clearly an attempt to bypass that - I'd also consider blocking the creator for disruption. Giant Snowman 13:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

V. V. Rajendran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Founder and president of Socialist Janata Dal in Kerala, likely a non-notable party. Doesn't make him inherently notable. No significant coverage beyond passing mentions. Nothing to justify inclusion. Junbeesh (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, India, and Kerala. Junbeesh (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Qazançı

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to meet WP:NEVENT. Could be summarized and merged to Qazançı, Agdam and sourced there if possible, then redirected. Cremastra (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Azerbaijan. Cremastra (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Armenia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Banani DNCC-Unique Complex

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly fails WP:GNG, None of the sources give significant coverage to the topic, Only 1-2 lines are about the building in the sources. Koshuri ^(グ) 13:53, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Koshuri ^(グ) 13:53, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:12, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:02, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Cochran (Survivor contestant)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reading the prior nomination on him, the "keep" votes were based on (presumed notability of) other existing Survivor winners (until recent years of AFD noms on certain winners).

This discussion isn't about the article quality. Rather it's about this person's general notability and any other sort of (applicable) notability thereof. He might or might not, but most of the sources used significantly covered him as the winner of Survivor: Caramoan, especially one EW article of winners list and a university's article about alumni and a CBS magazine article.

A recap article by EW details his cameo appearance in Survivor: Game Changers, but then that's just a recap article, despite the magazine being highly reputable. (BTW, the author of the article has expressed his opinions in other articles.)

I'm kinda cautious about using an ABA Journal article to verify his notability. The source was probably promoting his then-upcoming interview, which is a primary source, one of which to never use to verify this person's notability per GNG. (Will describe some other sources soon.)

I don't wanna argue with others back and forth similar to the other AFD discussion. Nonetheless, I fear similar arguments made in that discussion would be inevitable.

As said in that discussion, if WP:BLP1E isn't applicable to you, then how about WP:BIO1E instead, WP:NBASIC, WP:PAGEDECIDE, and/or WP:BIOSPECIAL? Furthermore, WP:BLP should also apply. Indeed, I'm not confident (yet) about his notability for his Survivor: South Pacific gameplay and its compliance with the BLP policy itself.

Sure, his roles in Survivor have been significant, but his amount of major roles IMO hasn't come close to meeting WP:NACTOR. Well, he's been a post-Survivor television writer, but whether he meets WP:NAUTHOR isn't the main issue. Rather WP:NBASIC and WP:BIOSPECIAL should supersede his (non-)compliance with WP:NAUTHOR. George Ho (talk) 08:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Academic journals, and Washington, D.C.. George Ho (talk) 08:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to find reliable sources verifying his (general) notability, but I can't use this questionnaire answered by the article subject himself. Entertainment Now cites IMDB, which is an unreliable (user-generated) source. I'm uncertain whether to use this profile page either. I can say the same about this source, which is citing (if not reporting) the same EW questionnaire that I wouldn't use.

Almost forgot: The page should be redirect to his winning season, Survivor: Caramoan. George Ho (talk) 08:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep and TBAN the nominater who has been persistently nominating these pages for deletion sometimes more then once Wikipedia is not a place for BIAS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwew345t (talk • contribs) 15:28, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thowing every magic word in a attepmt to get pages you demonstrate a WP:IDONTLIKE is counter productive Wwew345t (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Wwew345t, this discussion is not about George Ho, but about the article. Feel free to take your concerns to his talk page, but following him around AfD is not productive. I'll also note your comment on this talk page. win8x (talk) 15:49, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

apologies i missread the reporting system I thought I had to bring my concerns ti the page I feel the problems are occurring Wwew345t (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless my vote is still KEEP as there are secondary sources proving notability Wwew345t (talk) 15:50, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

where should I put my concerns? Wwew345t (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moinuddin Hadi Naqshband

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet the general notability guideline due to the fact that the article subject lacks coverage in reliable, independent sources. The article's content is not verified by reliable, independent sources, and instead the article relies upon primary sources of dubious authenticity that seem to be produced by the article subject’s own organization. Even if the sources were authentic, we have no way of accessing them, and therefore there is no way of knowing whether or not they even verify what is contained in the article. HyperShark244 (talk) 05:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Islam, and Jammu and Kashmir. HyperShark244 (talk) 05:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A Historical figure of cultural significance. And there are multiple reliable sources mentioned as citations. Maybe this article needs to be improved. But before nominating for deletion, you should always consider Wp:BEFORE. Zuck28 (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You suggest that the article be kept but it's up to you to search for the necessary sourcing. Claims to the tune of "Surely, there are sources" or "This is a historical subject" count for nothing, I'm afraid. -The Gnome (talk) 22:37, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Cultural significance can be mirrored in the high amount of prilgrims seeking blessings by the figure as a saint until today (WP:RECENTISM) (WP:NOTE) (WP:GNG). Sources are independant and confirm the notability in a verifiable and traceable manner (WP:RS) (WP:V). Hence this topic has no self-promotion inherent and meets encyclopedic standards (WP:NOT)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayonnaise.sandiwch.123 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC) sock Girth Summit _(blether) 12:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mayonnaise.sandiwch.123 has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: while the article has undergone an expansion and more citations have been added to it, multiple references within the article do not look reliable. For example, Tazkare Khwanadane Hazrat Eshan published by a company that is part of the organization which the article subject is a member of- the Naqshbandi order or Naqshbandiyya, and E. J. W. Gibb Memorial by Nicholson, Reynold. The other sources need to be evaluated- they need to be reliable, independent and non-primary sources. Then, the article should be cleaned up, and any content attributed to unreliable or otherwise inappropriate sources should be removed. Then, what remains should be considered and the discussion on whether or not the article should be kept can continue. HyperShark244 (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request: cleanup the article Moinuddin Hadi Naqshband and remove all content that is not verified through reliable, independent and non-primary sources from the article. Pinging @Onel5969: @HistoryofIran: @UrielAcosta: HyperShark244 (talk) 06:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup complete, all content not attributed to reliable, independent and non-primary sources removed. Thank you HistoryofIran and UrielAcosta! HyperShark244 (talk) 03:18, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Onel5969: @HistoryofIran: @UrielAcosta: @Kinu: @Xxanthippe: @Bearian: @TH1980: I hope you don't mind me pinging you. Lets get this AfD debate over with. HyperShark244 (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure. The remaining citations aren't the most impressive, and I can't find a single mention of this figure in Google ebooks. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of significant cover. Bearian (talk) 01:51, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because subject cannot meet WP:GNG. -The Gnome (talk) 17:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article is about the historical figure in Kashmir, so rather to add maintenance tags to improve it than to delete it. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me)
Not a valid argument for keeping the article. You merely asserted that the article subject is notable without giving anything to support your assertion, or refute what I wrote- “the article does not meet the general notability guideline due to the fact that the article subject lacks coverage in reliable, independent sources.” As The Gnome wrote earlier “claims to the tune of "Surely, there are sources" or "This is a historical subject" count for nothing, I'm afraid”. HyperShark244 (talk) 05:34, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Neither of the two Keeps provides a meaningful argument for retention, but we can give this another week in hope of sources surfacing.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 08:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I note that there is much more information in the French WP article, which also has another source by an American scholar. I'll check it out and come back. RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Nomination withdrawn following GLL's update. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 09:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let's Come Together

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At present, neither of the DAB items are specifically for the specific phrase "Let's Come Together". A quick search shows that "Sweet Harmony" is often called "Let's Come Together." The other item on the list is a DAB page. Given that we don't typically include misremembered title[s] on disambiguation pages, I feel like this is an unnecessary DAB. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:41, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:58, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, now that I've expanded this. Also, wow there are a lot of songs and albums called Let's Come Together. Like, so many. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Emmanuel Alade

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage found, non-notable individual. Not sure why this subject should have a page yet. Pizza on Pineapple ^{(Let's eat🍕)} 07:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Architecture. Pizza on Pineapple ^{(Let's eat🍕)} 07:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: as WP:A7; I already tagged. We do not curate articles on people who blatantly fail WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. Not with dubious advertorials listed as sources. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:59, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Deletion Nomination: Emmanuel Alade

I respectfully oppose the proposed deletion of the Emmanuel Alade article. The subject meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for creative professionals, as evidenced by the following:

1. Significant Coverage in Reliable Sources: BusinessDay featured an article detailing how Emmanuel Alade is creating platforms for young African creatives, highlighting his impact on the African entertainment industry. [6]

Vanguard News reported on Alade's involvement in the Black Excellence Project, emphasizing his contributions to empowering young black individuals in the field of architecture. [7]

2. Independent and Reputable Sources: The coverage comes from established and reputable news outlets, ensuring the information is both reliable and independent of the subject.

3. Impact and Recognition: Alade's initiatives, such as founding Afrobeatsglobal and Uncut Xtra Magazine, have been instrumental in promoting African music and culture, providing platforms for emerging artists. [8]

His participation in the Black Excellence Project showcases his commitment to mentoring and developing young talents in architecture and related fields. [9]

4. Professional Achievements: As an architect, Alade has contributed to notable projects, including the Eblana project in Dublin and the Abbey Street Project, demonstrating his professional expertise. [10]

Request for Article Improvement: I am committed to enhancing the article by:

Incorporating additional third-party reliable sources.
Expanding on his architectural works and entrepreneurial ventures.
Ensuring the content adheres to Wikipedia's neutrality and verifiability standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waleayanda (talk • contribs) 08:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: an article about a real person that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject Ibjaja055 (talk) 08:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails GNG and no significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 09:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I am unable to find GNG-worthy sources.Frank Ken (talk) 11:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal Against Speedy Deletion Nomination: I respectfully request reconsideration of the deletion nomination for the Emmanuel Alade article. Multiple reputable sources, including ThisDay, BusinessDay, The Independent, and The Guardian Nigeria, have provided significant and independent coverage of his contributions to entertainment and African cultural promotion. These sources demonstrate his notability, aligning with Wikipedia’s General Notability Guideline (GNG). I believe this article adds value to Wikipedia’s mission of sharing knowledge and kindly urge the reviewing editor to allow further improvements rather than deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waleayanda (talk • contribs) 10:44, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The sources are blatant promotional pieces with mostly hidden bylines. @Waleayanda, please stop making AI-generated responses. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 11:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Devlin

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I no longer believe that the disambiguation is necessary as only The Green Album (Skankin' Pickle album) mention Steve Devlin by name presently. BangJan1999 07:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. BangJan1999 07:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:59, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Steve Devlin of Skankin' Pickle is also named at Skafunkrastapunk and Skankin' Pickle Live. Steve Devlin is also the name of character in Stingers, played by John Brumpton, and a current defensive coordinator for the Ursinus Bears, named at List of current NCAA Division III football coaches. That said, none of these pages give detailed information about Steve Devlin, so I don't think they're overly helpful as DAB items. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 09:04, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For reference, I think the crux of this AfD is how we interpret MOS:DABMENTION: If the topic does not have an article of its own, but is discussed within another article, then a link to that article may be included if it would provide value to the reader (emphasis mine). Thus, the question is whether the information provided at the articles mentioned is enough to provide value to the reader. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 09:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kha with inverted breve

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded by Cyclopia. They wrote that they think that there is no notabiliny guideline for letters; I think WP:GNG applies, and I doubt that sigcov exists about this topic. Janhrach (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Alaska. Janhrach (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only find one-line mentions of this "letter" in Unicode documents. Nothing needing a whole article. Lack of sourcing, not showing notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So there can be no exceptions to notability guidelines, but deletion policy can be ignored without a reason? Peter James (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Peter James: How exactly did I ignore the deletion policy? Janhrach (talk) 18:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion, the article could have been merged or redirected (or proposed for merging). It's mentioned in Aleut language#Orthography so could be redirected there, or merged to Kha (Cyrillic) where there is currently no mention. Peter James (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a mention into Kha (Cyrillic). The article is so short that I do not think it can be reasonably "merged". As for redirection, is it a problem to discuss it at AfD, especially when notability is in question and there is no single proposed redirect target? Janhrach (talk) 19:10, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Given that I see no specific guideline for alphabetical characters, one could fall back to WP:GNG; however it seems to me it would fail short of this peculiar subject. WP:5P1 states "Wikipedia combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers." Considering alphabetical characters as notable per se seems to me consistent with this description. I have no qualms however with a merge to e.g.Kha (Cyrillic).--cyclopia ^speak! 15:32, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Kha (Cyrillic). The article is quite short and this letter does not seem to warrant its own article. I also can only find Wikipedia mirrors and Unicode documents mentioning anything about this character, but instead of deleting it, I think we could just merge it into Kha (Cyrillic) with a short summary of its existence in Aleut. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Could find no reliable and significant coverage in independent sources. 1)-Attempts to argue semantics, that there is no "notabiliny (sic) guideline for letters" is laughable as the verifiability covers content in articles like a blanket. The Wikipedia:Notability "policy" includes: Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable, independent sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article. Merging: I do not merge unsourced content. It degrades the target article and it might be hard to convince an Admin to merge unsourced content. There is no way to tell if original research is involved which could enter areas of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. I didn't look but it seems Cyrillic script would have important information included. -- Otr500 (talk) 21:32, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Kha (Cyrillic). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Message Exchange Bus (MXB)

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Message Exchange Bus (MXB)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not a single reasonable source Baratiiman (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – If a user doesn’t know Persian or how to simply translate a Persian page to English with Google Translate, it doesn’t make all the Persian references unusable or unreasonable. The Persian references in this article come from the most reasonable, reliable, mainstream, and important news sites in the Persian language, some of which have more than 70 years of experience. The English references are not mainstream, but most of them are reliable and rational or at least secondhand, if not firsthand. Having problems with references doesn’t make the whole subject worthy of deletion; rather, adding more reliable references would be more reasonable.

Thank you for your time. Taha Danesh (talk) 16:47, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Danesh. The article does need work, though. With so many false statements in essay-like prose that I just removed, I wouldn't be surprised if the article was written with AI. Aaron Liu (talk) 20:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, participants are welcome to re-review this article which has been edited since its nomination,
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:41, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Two of the ITO sources are press releases and therefore fail WP:PRSOURCE, while the "Digital Platforms and Services" page only contains a single sentence about the MXB and therefore doesn't qualify as SIGCOV. Based on these sources alone, I would vote to delete, but I don't know enough about Iranian media (or any of the language) to make a judgment on the other sources, so I'll leave it at that. MiasmaEternal☎ 23:00, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly that page is made by the government, so it would be primary either way. Secondly, I think that every source that's not from ITO here qualifies for GNG, even discounting the ones I removed which also count. Aaron Liu (talk) 23:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 06:29, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep / withdrawn by nominator‎. (non-admin closure) GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:24, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Higgins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:ONEOTHER, only two articles of people with this name. jolielover♥talk 06:04, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. jolielover♥talk 06:04, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn by nominator I have misunderstood and apologize for it. Now I realize the disamb. page is valid and should stay. jolielover♥talk 06:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This dab page was created per Talk:Emma_Higgins_(footballer)#Requested_move_7_February_2025 RM which voted to move Emma Higgins (footballer) previously at the primary, I had closed the RM, moved the page, and created this dab per consensus at the RM. Courtesy pinging RM participants, @Bearcat, GiantSnowman, and Svartner:. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I understand, I support the move but since there are only two people with the name, I believe a disambiguation page is not needed and a hatnote should suffice. jolielover♥talk 06:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jolielover Which subject do you believe is the primary topic? GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:14, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Neither, the name of the articles currently works as neither seem to be the primary topic. I just think a hatnote on their pages should work, e.g "For the filmmaker, see Emma Higgins (filmmaker)." jolielover♥talk 06:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but without a primary topic, then we must use the base name as a disambiguation page. Or else, where do we send people searching for "Emma Higgens"? GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A hatnote does not "suffice" between two disambiguated titles. The plain title Emma Higgins must exist as one of two things: either a disambiguation page, or one of the two Emma Higginses getting moved to it as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the name, and there is absolutely no option for "two disambiguated titles both hatnote to each other while leaving the plain title blank". So which Emma Higgins are you proposing to move to the plain title, since that's the only possible alternative to a dab page here? Bearcat (talk) 06:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:TWODABS. The problem here is that neither the footballer nor the filmmaker is markedly more notable than the other for the purposes of being able to claim WP:PRIMARYTOPIC rights for the undisambiguated name — so the plain title has to be a dab page, because it can't be either the footballer or the filmmaker. WP:ONEOTHER is for when there's a primary topic, i.e. one of the two people is markedly more notable than the other and gets to be at the plain title, so which Emma Higgins are you proposing is more notable than the other Emma Higgins here? Bearcat (talk) 06:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Kristina Gurung

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Role in just a single Notable film, the subject fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Taabii (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Nepal. Taabii (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Prem_Geet_3#Cast: and undo the redirect when the filmography includes more roles. -Mushy Yank. 22:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for Redirect. And User:Mushy Yank, I don't understand what you are advising to do besides Redirection. You have to make things very simple and clear for closers.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:59, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. And later in time, if she has more roles, expand the page back into an article. -Mushy Yank. 10:41, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Karanni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having examined all the sources in the article (except the offline German article from the 1930s), and done some searches of my own, I think there is only a single sentence of information extant about this figure: he was king when Tudhaliya and Suppiluliuma invaded Hayasa-Azzi. He gets namedropped in passing in histories of the Hittites, but the discussion does not rise to the level of WP:SIGCOV. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 05:45, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Royalty and nobility, and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:52, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sathyam gujja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of salted title: Sathyam Gujja, which was salted in 2021 due to constant recreation. Subject appears to lack notability, and a WP:BEFORE search doesn't show much, if any, coverage from reliable sources. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:17, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:17, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is a well known activist in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, he has gained more prominence in the past 4 years and deserves to be known Abcd45678 (talk) 04:21, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

the subject is a back ward class activist and also an educationalist.see the references^[1] D u p e s g w y n (talk) 04:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Observation: Just want to note that user above did not have any contributions prior to this AfD, and is likely a sock of the author. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:52, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.eenadu.net/telugu-news/districts/hyderabad-news/529/124066274

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: On WP:BEFORE search I didn’t found any sig cov. of this subject in independent reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG TheSlumPanda (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is an unbolded Keep here so I'd like to hear more opinions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Lucidity Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an organization, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for organizations. As always, organizations are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to pass WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH on WP:GNG worthy analysis of their significance -- but this is "referenced" solely to its own self-published website about itself rather than any evidence of third-party coverage, and has been flagged for needing additional referencing since 2012 without ever having any better referencing added. Bearcat (talk) 05:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 05:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Psychology, and Hawaii. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Performance of Bangladesh Men's Cricket Team in International Cricket

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTSTATS. Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information. Chanaka L (talk) 05:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket, Lists, and Bangladesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:35, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There are other articles that cover all of Bangladesh's recent cricket tours already. Ajf773 (talk) 09:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

George DiCaprio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTINHERITED, George here is only known in connection with his famous son Leonardo DiCaprio. His "acting debut" is a very small few second cameo, his work as a writer/artist (not really clear) fails WP:ARTIST and his work as a filmmaker fails WP:FILMMAKER, getting a small stint editing on local newspapers does not make you notable. Source 5 in the article shows he's worked on... three comics? Don't know if it's even reliable as a source but clearly not noteworthy in itself. jolielover♥talk 14:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Artists, and Authors. jolielover♥talk 14:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Note expanded bibliography, which establishes DiCaprio as an active editor and writer in the underground movement in the 1970s (extending into the early 1980s). -- stoshmaster (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He stills fails WP:AUTHOR, as none of his work in the bibliography is notable. jolielover♥talk 03:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ. The entire underground comix movement was designed to change people's perceptions of what stories were "worth" telling in the comics format, so many products of that era fail a mainstream definition of "notablity". Nonetheless, the material produced during that era changed the comics industry forever, heralding the alternative comics movement and the rise of the graphic novel. That history has been well established. DiCaprio's role during that time as a writer, publisher, editor, and distributor is also well-established. Not to mention that he collaborated with such "notable" artists as Justin Green and Jay Kinney, and contributed to anthologies such as Arcade and Slow Death. -- stoshmaster (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yours is an admirably expressive and nuanced opinion. However, our own take matters very little as far as a person's notability is concerned. Sources rule-The Gnome (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and is not saved by WP:ARTIST. Wikipedia is not a collection of random articles nor a directory of artists. And the fact that the text has been created by a kamikaze account does not exactly help. -The Gnome (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:38, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because there are at least three good sources. However, there are several sources that need to be removed and the article tagged as needing better sources, if it is kept. Bearian (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't about the sources, obviously Leonardo DiCaprio's dad is going to have a plethora of articles about him no matter what he did. The issue is that he has no notability outside of being Leo's father. jolielover♥talk 05:15, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Northwest Indiana Stars

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another defunct ABA team that fails WP:GNG, All the sources have practically faded away. A Google search only brings up this Wikipedia page, and a basketball stats website that has been untouched for over 10 years.

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Basketball, and Indiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:35, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Facebook outage

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its been several years since this happened. Services go down all the time, yes this was a bit longer than most, but there isn't any lasting significance here. This event hasn't been/won't be remembered in the same way as (for example) New York City blackout of 1977 (which may be an analogous topic). After doing an internet search, I haven't seen any sustained coverage since the event (as desired by WP:PERSISTENCE). JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 03:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Companies, and Internet. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 03:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There has been plenty of coverage after the outage, including research into the outage's effects. This indicates lasting significance. [11], [12], [13], [14] (search for "outage"). Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Keep there's retrospective academic sources on the outage (such as [15][16][17]) and the outage clearly is still remembered, as it's being cited in recent coverage of outages. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:46, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Helpful Raccoon and Elli. A search on Google Scholar shows plenty of retrospective academic sources about the outage, both from a broadly sociological perspective and from a software engineering/site reliability perspective. I think there's enough ongoing coverage to satisfy WP:NEVENT. MCE89 (talk) 05:12, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Some outages are not notable. I think this is on my watchlist because there was some minor one that we redirected here as non notable, but this outage is clearly notable as per sources in the article and given above. It is a very widely used case study. No doubt at all that this one should be kept. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:43, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Centum City

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is very poorly written and has only one source. Most of the sections of the article are meaningless. There are no good sources on Centum City in English. Sgroey (talk) 03:12, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Korean counterpart of this article, ko:센텀시티, only has one source, too. This district may well be notable enough to warrant an article, but this is not the kind of article we're looking for. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and South Korea. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: need more significant coverages without this can't deserves standalone article. AgerJoy talk 09:14, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Really extensive coverage in the Korean language; google the Korean name and scroll around. This is a major development project in one of the most major districts of the second most important city in the country. Poorly written articles are not grounds for deletion. seefooddiet (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

True Market Value

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

True Market Value is a common term. It refers to the price a buyer is willing to pay for a property, a product or service. It is not restricted to the real estate market or to online auctions. The text of this article is gibberish to me. The term True Market Value does not require a Wikipedia article; maybe an entry in wiktionary. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:54, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Economics. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:54, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this article is gibberish and the citations do not support the text. This isn't notable enough to be worth salvaging. Basedeunie042 (talk) 04:58, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment. I see now that the page was originally a redirect to Market value. Maybe it is preferable to WP:BLAR to Market value, instead of deleting in order to preserve the edit history. I would be happy either way. Any thoughts? Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need more opinions not just on the quality of the article but what should happen here, Keep, Delete, Redirect, Merge or Draftify are your options.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Market value. I'm finding some use of the term in real estate discourse, but I don't think it's an independent concept of Market Value that deserves its own article. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heptagonal tiling honeycomb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a random hyper-compact tessellation. Nothing to establish notability. Of the sources in the article the only one that mentions this particular hyperbolic tessellation is the Nelson & Segerman preprint, which uses it as an example.

I could not find any coverage on this particular tessellation in specific anywhere (Google scholar and JSTOR come up with zero results, TWL has nothing useful). I really suspect the title for this article is WP:NEO which does confound the search a little bit.

It would be shocking if this was notable, since the article fails to provide anything other than a generic description. Pretty much everything here could be said about any hyper-compact hyperbolic tessellation, with only the specific numbers changed. AquitaneHungerForce (talk) 03:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:01, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sauj Bulagh Massacre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N, largely relies on one source and no other verifiable sources or evidence of this massacre having occurred exist. Surayeproject3 (talk) 02:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:35, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Military, Iran, and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Arroyo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this Argentine rugby player. JTtheOG (talk) 02:54, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and Argentina. JTtheOG (talk) 02:54, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as he has played professionally for Benetton Rugby in the United Rugby Championship, a top-tier international competition, and has represented Argentina at the Under-20 level, demonstrating notability in rugby. His career has been covered by reliable sources--Loewstisch (talk) 09:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPORTBASIC requires at least one source providing SIGCOV. JTtheOG (talk) 20:32, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing beyond passing mentions on ProQuest. JoelleJay (talk) 21:14, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 03:06, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Manuel Arroyo meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for athletes. He has played professionally for Benetton Rugby in the United Rugby Championship and represented Argentina U20 at the international level. Multiple reliable sources confirm his career, including official team websites and news articles. His professional experience and international representation establish clear notability.AuthorChiman (talk) 05:03, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
SPORTBASIC requires at least one source providing SIGCOV. JTtheOG (talk) 05:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I wasn't able to find any sources providing SIGCOV either. Playing professionally and representing his country's U20 team aren't evidence of meeting WP:SPORTBASIC. MCE89 (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no indication of notability fails GNG. AgerJoy talk 09:17, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold Philimon Peter

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soft deleted previously due to lack of in-depth coverage. Still fails WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 01:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and California. Shellwood (talk) 02:27, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 01:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Private Eye Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough independent sources. Some sources are directly from The Private Eye Project or from Kerry Ruef, its founder.

The Ed.uab.edu source is from attendees of a Private Eye talk.
The Stone and Barlow book is a collection of essays including one by Ruef about Private Eye.
The Microscopy Today source is an article by Ruef.

Other sources just briefly mention Private Eye as something that exists. One is a defunct storefront. The only independent sources that have something notable to say about Private Eye are the WBHM article and possibly the book by Robert Bernstein, which I don't have. There isn't enough here to write a neutral article. Truthnope (talk) 02:21, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Philosophy, Education, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:04, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Airborne Athletics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quick Google search turned up no secondary sources. Fails WP:NCORP. Notability not established. (Acer's Communication Receptacle | what did I do now) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 02:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:INDEPENDENT. Truthnope (talk) 03:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Basketball, Volleyball, and Minnesota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Charleston City Lions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct American Basketball Association (2000-present) team that fails WP:GNG, many of the sources have faded away, the only spurce I could possibly find is by the ABA official website. Google only yields this Wikipedia page and a Fandom page also with no reliable sources.

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 February 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Basketball, and South Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to List of former American Basketball Association (2000–present) teams barring further coverage emerging. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alain J. Picard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A superficially nice article about a regional artist with no claim of notability. Weak citations, a few small awards, and no evidence of impact or reputation to support WP:NARTIST (e.g., "has been recognized for" links to his own site and a gallery that doesn't suport the claim). Two instructional books, no evidence of independent reviews, not a valid basis for WP:NAUTHOR. I did WP:BEFORE searches and I was unable to find anything additional to support WP:GNG.

Although not strictly a grounds for deletion, the article has hallmarks of WP:NOTCV. The lengthy gallery in particular makes this looks like a promotional page. Oblivy (talk) 01:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Artists. Oblivy (talk) 01:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lack of sources as well as WP:GNG. (Acer's Communication Receptacle | what did I do now) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 02:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Connecticut and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 09:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plandora

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT; no independent, significant coverage could be found. This article was originally about a non-notable project management application, but it appears to have been recently hijacked by a different software application also named "Plandora". Neither application meets WP:NSOFT so it should just be deleted. dePRODed in 2011 by the article's creator. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Travel and tourism, Software, and Singapore. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I wasn't able to find SIGCOV for either of the pieces of software. The original subject has some passing mentions, mostly in older sources comparing different open source project management tools, but I wasn't able to find anything approaching SIGCOV. The new subject (the travel software) appears to be very clearly non-notable. MCE89 (talk) 03:38, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Curious and Unusual Deaths

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced article about a television show. As always, television shows are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they existed, and have to show evidence of passing WP:GNG on third-party media coverage about them, but this cites absolutely no such coverage whatsoever. Bearcat (talk) 01:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 01:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kenta Sawada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Made two appearances in the J3 League in 2019, has not played in the J3 or higher leagues since RossEvans19 (talk) 00:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. User:RossEvans19 talk 00:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 04:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails every guideline. Geschichte (talk) 07:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hukhalatri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced by a wiki type site and contains too many unsourced statements that could be disputed. "He was a truthful and spotless king, and a follower of Buddha." This appears to be about a person and a place. I don't feel this is ready for mainspace. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jammu and Kashmir-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:08, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Soma Ishigamori

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Retired in 2020 after 3 appearances, unfortunately fails GNG RossEvans19 (talk) 00:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. User:RossEvans19 talk 00:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 04:53, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails every guideline. Geschichte (talk) 07:23, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:20, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The War on Warriors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK. All sources are primarily about the author and most only briefly mention the book.मल्ल (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Military. मल्ल (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The book topped the NYT non-fiction bestseller list [18]. Per WP:NBOOK, this in itself qualifies as a non-trivial published work about the book given that the bestseller list itself is notable, in addition to the fact that it is republished and reported on by other sources (e.g. [19] [20]). This article in the Washington Post qualifies as a second non-trivial published work about the book, and this op-ed in the New York Times is a third. I think those three sources are enough to meet WP:NBOOK criteria 1. There are also plenty of other sources that discuss ideas from the book in the context of Hegseth's confirmation, including [21] [22] [23] [24], and the book was directly referenced by Trump in announcing Hegseth as the nominee [25]. I think that's potentially enough to make a weak case for WP:NBOOK criteria 3 on the basis that the book played a significant role in a political movement/event (in this case, the right wing attacks on "DEI" and "wokeness" in the US military). MCE89 (talk) 04:36, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nominator is unsure that they are seeking a deletion. It's not clear on what they want so I'm closing this as a Speedy Keep. No penalty for another editor bringing this article to AFD with a coherent deletion rationale. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

European Regions Airline Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moving from PROD to AfD. Looks like not meeting NCORP but maybe some sources do exist NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 13:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Aviation, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 13:23, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Europe, Belgium, England, and Wales. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment' I am not fully in favor of deletion, as I suspect the page might be improved ( WP:HEY). --NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 10:52, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:02, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] ttps://www.eenadu.net/telugu-news/districts/hyderabad-news/529/124066274

[1]